Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- validations:tr3_shell_hyperboloid [2023/02/01 07:47]
Ali Baba [Validation data]
+++ validations:tr3_shell_hyperboloid [2023/02/01 07:53]
Ali Baba
@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 ^608	|3.73E-05	|7.63E-05	|-1.97E-06	|8.50E-05	|5.60E-05	|4.66E-05	|3.07E-05	|7.90E-05	|-7.00%	|
-The maximum difference on the rotations is 70%. The differences on the rotations are larger than on the translations. But, as for the [[validations:qd4_shell_hyperboloid|QD4 SHELL element validation]] **we must be cautious about these results**. Indeed, **the Abaqus S3 element seems to have 6 degrees of freedom per node, while the MITC3 element implemented in SesamX has only 5 (no drilling rotation)**. Hence the S3 adds inevitably some terms on the rotational degrees of freedom.
+The maximum difference on the rotations is 70%. The differences on the rotations are larger than on the translations. But, as for the [[validations:qd4_shell_hyperboloid|QD4 SHELL-MITC element validation]] **we must be cautious about these results**. Indeed, **the Abaqus S3 element seems to have 6 degrees of freedom per node, while the MITC3 element implemented in SesamX has only 5 (no drilling rotation)**. Hence the S3 adds inevitably some terms on the rotational degrees of freedom.
@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 ===== References =====
-  * [[https://www.sesamx.io/blog/triangular_shell_finite_element_formulation/ | The SesamX TR3 SHELL finite element explained]]
+  * [[https://www.sesamx.io/blog/triangular_shell_finite_element_formulation/ | The SesamX TR3 SHELL-MITC finite element explained]]
   * [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045794917309550 | The full MITC3 element validation]]