https://www.sesamx.io/doc/ 2026-05-18T17:00:04+00:00 https://www.sesamx.io/doc/ https://www.sesamx.io/doc/_media/favicon.ico text/html 2023-05-31T20:40:03+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.sesamx.io/doc/validations/he8-solid-twisted-beam?rev=1685558403&do=diff HE8 SOLID-MITC element twisted beam validation This validation aims at assessing the behavior of the SesamX HE8 SOLID-MITC element against the equivalent Abaqus C3D8I element. The Abaqus element implements the hexahedron with incompatible modes, whereas the SesamX element implements the $E = 200 GPa$$\nu = 0.33$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$\varepsilon_{11} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{22} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{33} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{11} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{22} (\%)$$\vare… text/html 2023-02-01T07:53:49+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.sesamx.io/doc/validations/ln2_beam_cantilever?rev=1675234429&do=diff LN2 BEAM-TIMO element cantilever validation This validation aims at assessing the behavior of the SesamX LN2 BEAM-TIMO element (Timoshenko beam element) against the equivalent Abaqus B31 element. Validation model The model studied for this comparison is made of a cantilever beam assembly.$1 m$$10 cm$$10000 mm^2$$1.406e7 mm^4$$8.33e6mm^4$$0.44$$E = 200 GPa$$\nu = 0.33$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$r_x (rad)$$r_y (rad)$$r_z (rad)$$r_x (rad)$$r_y (rad)$$r_z (ra… text/html 2023-02-01T07:53:35+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.sesamx.io/doc/validations/ln2_truss_assembly?rev=1675234415&do=diff LN2 TRUSS-STANDARD element assembly validation This validation aims at assessing the behavior of the SesamX LN2 TRUSS-STANDARD element against the equivalent Abaqus T3D2 element. Validation model The model studied for this comparison is made of a the following truss assembly.$m$$mm^2$$E = 200GPa$$\nu = 0.33$$u_{x} (m)$$u_{y} (m)$$(m)$$u_{x} (m)$$u_{y} (m)$$(m)$$\varepsilon_{11}(\%)$$\varepsilon_{11}(\%)$$\varepsilon_{11}$$\sigma_{11}(MPa)$$\sigma_{11}(MPa)$$\sigma_{11}$ text/html 2023-05-31T20:40:33+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.sesamx.io/doc/validations/te10-solid-twisted-beam?rev=1685558433&do=diff TE10 SOLID-ISOPARAM element twisted beam validation This validation aims at assessing the behavior of the SesamX TE10 SOLID-ISOPARAM element against the equivalent Abaqus C3D10 element. These 2 elements implement the iso-parametric tetrahedron element. We expect the results to be identical.$E = 200 GPa$$\nu = 0.33$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$\varepsilon_{11} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{22} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{33} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{11} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{22} (\%)$$\va… text/html 2023-02-01T07:53:20+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.sesamx.io/doc/validations/tr3_shell_hyperboloid?rev=1675234400&do=diff TR3 SHELL-MITC element hyperboloid validation This validation aims at assessing the behavior of the SesamX TR3 SHELL-MITC element (MITC3 element) against the equivalent Abaqus S3 element. We expect to notice some discrepancies between these elements because their formulations are different. $x$$80 mm$$E = 200 GPa$$ν = 0.33$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$u_x (m)$$u_y (m)$$u_z (m)$$(m)$$r_x (rad)$$r_y (rad)$$r_z (rad)$$r_x (rad)$$r_y (rad)$$r_z (rad)$$(rad)$$\varepsilon_{11} (\%)$$\varepsilon_{…